Logo
International Journal of
Medical and Health Research
ARCHIVES
VOL. 5, ISSUE 11 (2019)
Haemodynamic response to laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube, a clinical comparative study
Authors
Abhijit Tarat, Arnav Das, Ramesh Kumar
Abstract
Background: Laryngeal mask airway is becoming increasingly popular in anaesthetic practice. It has the advantage of maintaining airway both for spontaneous and controlled ventilation without requiring laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Aims: The aim of this study was to measure the haemodynamic response to the insertion of the LMA in normotensive patients and compare it with endotracheal intubation and also chances of regurgitation and aspiration associated with the use of it. Methods: The study comprised of 100 cases undergoing elective surgery of 45 minutes to 1 hour duration divided into 2 groups of 50 each. In Group 1, endotracheal tube was placed whereas in group 2 LMA was inserted. Pulse, blood pressure and ECG observed after one minute, three minute and five minutes. Conclusion: The effect of haemodynamic response using two different techniques (ETT and LMA) was similar but the magnitude of response was less with LMA and also the risk of regurgitation with it not greater than ETT at least in short duration elective surgery.
Download
Pages:130-133
How to cite this article:
Abhijit Tarat, Arnav Das, Ramesh Kumar "Haemodynamic response to laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube, a clinical comparative study". International Journal of Medical and Health Research, Vol 5, Issue 11, 2019, Pages 130-133
Download Author Certificate

Please enter the email address corresponding to this article submission to download your certificate.